（同トピックのタイトルを変更しました）
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
9/11当時FEMAに所属しグランド・ゼロを撮影したビデオカメラマン、Kurt Sonnenfeldさんは現在アルゼンチンに亡命中。 そこで911に関する本『the persecuted』を執筆しました。彼へのインタビュー記事がネット上に出ています。
http://
ざっと読んだところですが、目立つ部分を転載します。
英語に強い方々、できれば補足やコメントなどよろしくお願いします。
There were many things, in hindsight, that were disturbing at Ground Zero. It was odd to me that I was dispatched to go to New York even before the second plane hit the South Tower, while the media was still reporting only that a “small plane” had collided with the North Tower ― far too small of a catastrophe at that point to involve FEMA . FEMA was mobilized within minutes, whereas it took ten days for it to deploy to New Orleans to respond to Hurricane Katrina, even with abundant advance warning! It was odd to me that all cameras were so fiercely prohibited within the secured perimeter of Ground Zero, that the entire area was declared a crime scene and yet the “evidence” within that crime scene was so rapidly removed and destroyed. And then it was very odd to me when I learned that FEMA and several other federal agencies had already moved into position at their command center at Pier 92 on September 10th, one day before the attacks!
（2機目が突入する前からニューヨークへ行くよう指示されたのは妙だった。と言うのは、その時点でメディアは「小型機」が衝突したと報告していて、大災害を扱うべきFEMAが出る場合ではなかった。ハリケーン・カトリーナの時に出動するには10日かかった。グランド・ゼロ周辺の撮影は厳しく禁止されていたのも奇妙だった。犯行現場とされながらも証拠は急いで取り除かれ、破壊された。さらにおかしいのは、FEMAやその他いくつかの連邦エイジェンシーは事件の一日前、9月10日に＜Pier 92＞という指令センターに配置されていた。）
What happened with Building 7 is incredibly suspicious. I have video that shows how curiously small the rubble pile was, and how the buildings to either side were untouched by Building Seven when it collapsed. It had not been hit by an airplane; it had suffered only minor injuries when the Twin Towers collapsed, and there were only small fires on a couple of floors. There’s no way that building could have imploded the way it did without controlled demolition. Yet the collapse of Building 7 was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media and suspiciously ignored by the 911 Commission.
（WTC-7で起きたことは極めて疑わしい。崩壊後の残骸の山の小ささや、隣接するビルへ被害を出していないところなどを撮影した。ツインタワー崩壊時でも、WTC-7へはごくわずかなダメージしか与えていないし、火災もわずかの規模だった。制御解体以外には絶対にありえない崩れ方であったにもかかわらず、マスコミも911委員会もこのことにほとんど触れていない。）
it’s apparent that things of importance were taken out of harm’s way before the attacks. For example, the CIA didn’t seem too concerned about their losses.
（重要書類などは911攻撃のずっと前に移動させられていたのは明らかだ。例えばCIAは彼らが失ったはずのものを全く気にしていなかった。---ここではWTC-6に触れています）
At the highest levels in Washington, DC, someone knew what was going to happen. They wanted a war so badly that they at least let it happen and most likely even helped it happen.
（ワシントンの上層部の何人かは何が起こるかを知っていた。彼らは少なくても戦争を欲していたし、彼らがそれを起こさせたということの可能性も大変高い）
Sometimes it seems to me that the “nuts” are those who hold to what they’ve been told with an almost religious fervor despite all of the evidence to the contrary ― the ones who won’t even consider that there was a conspiracy. There are so many anomalies to the “official” investigation that you can’t blame it on oversight or incompetence. I am familiar with the scientists and qualified professionals to whom you refer, and their findings are convincing, credible, and presented according to scientific protocol ― in stark contrast to the findings of the “official” investigation. In addition, numerous intelligence agents and government officials have now come forward with their very informed opinions that the 911 Commission was a farce at best or a cover-up at worst. My experience at Ground Zero is but one more piece of the puzzle.
（多くの諜報部員、政府職員が豊富な情報を基に、9/11委員会が良く言っても「でっち上げ」、悪く言えば「隠蔽」だと言う意見を出している）
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kurt Sonnenfeldさんはまだ政府にも提出していない重要な映像を所有しているようで、これを公開する意志があるようです。
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
9/11当時FEMAに所属しグランド・ゼロを撮影したビデオカメラマン、Kurt Sonnenfeldさんは現在アルゼンチンに亡命中。 そこで911に関する本『the persecuted』を執筆しました。彼へのインタビュー記事がネット上に出ています。
http://
ざっと読んだところですが、目立つ部分を転載します。
英語に強い方々、できれば補足やコメントなどよろしくお願いします。
There were many things, in hindsight, that were disturbing at Ground Zero. It was odd to me that I was dispatched to go to New York even before the second plane hit the South Tower, while the media was still reporting only that a “small plane” had collided with the North Tower ― far too small of a catastrophe at that point to involve FEMA . FEMA was mobilized within minutes, whereas it took ten days for it to deploy to New Orleans to respond to Hurricane Katrina, even with abundant advance warning! It was odd to me that all cameras were so fiercely prohibited within the secured perimeter of Ground Zero, that the entire area was declared a crime scene and yet the “evidence” within that crime scene was so rapidly removed and destroyed. And then it was very odd to me when I learned that FEMA and several other federal agencies had already moved into position at their command center at Pier 92 on September 10th, one day before the attacks!
（2機目が突入する前からニューヨークへ行くよう指示されたのは妙だった。と言うのは、その時点でメディアは「小型機」が衝突したと報告していて、大災害を扱うべきFEMAが出る場合ではなかった。ハリケーン・カトリーナの時に出動するには10日かかった。グランド・ゼロ周辺の撮影は厳しく禁止されていたのも奇妙だった。犯行現場とされながらも証拠は急いで取り除かれ、破壊された。さらにおかしいのは、FEMAやその他いくつかの連邦エイジェンシーは事件の一日前、9月10日に＜Pier 92＞という指令センターに配置されていた。）
What happened with Building 7 is incredibly suspicious. I have video that shows how curiously small the rubble pile was, and how the buildings to either side were untouched by Building Seven when it collapsed. It had not been hit by an airplane; it had suffered only minor injuries when the Twin Towers collapsed, and there were only small fires on a couple of floors. There’s no way that building could have imploded the way it did without controlled demolition. Yet the collapse of Building 7 was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media and suspiciously ignored by the 911 Commission.
（WTC-7で起きたことは極めて疑わしい。崩壊後の残骸の山の小ささや、隣接するビルへ被害を出していないところなどを撮影した。ツインタワー崩壊時でも、WTC-7へはごくわずかなダメージしか与えていないし、火災もわずかの規模だった。制御解体以外には絶対にありえない崩れ方であったにもかかわらず、マスコミも911委員会もこのことにほとんど触れていない。）
it’s apparent that things of importance were taken out of harm’s way before the attacks. For example, the CIA didn’t seem too concerned about their losses.
（重要書類などは911攻撃のずっと前に移動させられていたのは明らかだ。例えばCIAは彼らが失ったはずのものを全く気にしていなかった。---ここではWTC-6に触れています）
At the highest levels in Washington, DC, someone knew what was going to happen. They wanted a war so badly that they at least let it happen and most likely even helped it happen.
（ワシントンの上層部の何人かは何が起こるかを知っていた。彼らは少なくても戦争を欲していたし、彼らがそれを起こさせたということの可能性も大変高い）
Sometimes it seems to me that the “nuts” are those who hold to what they’ve been told with an almost religious fervor despite all of the evidence to the contrary ― the ones who won’t even consider that there was a conspiracy. There are so many anomalies to the “official” investigation that you can’t blame it on oversight or incompetence. I am familiar with the scientists and qualified professionals to whom you refer, and their findings are convincing, credible, and presented according to scientific protocol ― in stark contrast to the findings of the “official” investigation. In addition, numerous intelligence agents and government officials have now come forward with their very informed opinions that the 911 Commission was a farce at best or a cover-up at worst. My experience at Ground Zero is but one more piece of the puzzle.
（多くの諜報部員、政府職員が豊富な情報を基に、9/11委員会が良く言っても「でっち上げ」、悪く言えば「隠蔽」だと言う意見を出している）
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kurt Sonnenfeldさんはまだ政府にも提出していない重要な映像を所有しているようで、これを公開する意志があるようです。
|
|
|
|
コメント(16)
「不都合な9/11目撃者」と題するKurt Sonnenfeldさんの手紙
2009年5月8日付け
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20461
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kurt Sonnenfeld: an inconvenient 9/11 witness
http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
Buenos Aires
Kurt Sonnenfeld: an inconvenient 9/11 witness
May 8, 2009
Statement by Kurt Sonnenfeld:
Does anyone believe the official version offered as to what happened on September 11, 2001? There are many who say that the wildest conspiracy theory of all is the theory offered by the United States Government. Do you know that on the weekend prior to the attacks on the WTC, all electricity was cut off for approximately 36 hours, including the security cameras and control systems in a highly irregular “maintenance operation”? Do you know that in the weeks leading up to the attacks there were several unusual evacuations of both towers? Do you know that the company in charge of security at the World Trade Center was directed by Marvin Bush, George Bush’s younger brother, and Wirt Walker III, George Bush’s cousin? Do you know that the same security company also lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," and provides security for classified and high-risk government sites? Do you know that hundreds of government personnel were pre-positioned in New York City on September 10, preparing to do a large scale simulation of a terrorist attack to be carried out on September 12? FEMA officials had already set up their command post at Pier 92 near the World Trade Center one day before the attacks.
Do you know that the 47-story Salomon Smith Barney Building, officially known as Seven World Trade Center, imploded at 5:20 in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, some nine hours after American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower? It took only about 6.5 seconds for the entire structure to fall straight down into itself, a half second more than the amount of time it would have taken a stone to hit the ground if you had dropped it from the roof in a vacuum. The collapse of Building Seven left a curiously small and tidy rubble pile, and the buildings to either side of it were relatively undamaged. It had not been hit by an airplane and had suffered only minor injuries to its structure when the Twin Towers collapsed.
Continues: http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
I wrote this book to save my family.
Scarlett, Paula, Kurt and Natasha Sonnenfeld
I would like to read the last few pages to you:
Continues: http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
2009年5月8日付け
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20461
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kurt Sonnenfeld: an inconvenient 9/11 witness
http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
Buenos Aires
Kurt Sonnenfeld: an inconvenient 9/11 witness
May 8, 2009
Statement by Kurt Sonnenfeld:
Does anyone believe the official version offered as to what happened on September 11, 2001? There are many who say that the wildest conspiracy theory of all is the theory offered by the United States Government. Do you know that on the weekend prior to the attacks on the WTC, all electricity was cut off for approximately 36 hours, including the security cameras and control systems in a highly irregular “maintenance operation”? Do you know that in the weeks leading up to the attacks there were several unusual evacuations of both towers? Do you know that the company in charge of security at the World Trade Center was directed by Marvin Bush, George Bush’s younger brother, and Wirt Walker III, George Bush’s cousin? Do you know that the same security company also lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," and provides security for classified and high-risk government sites? Do you know that hundreds of government personnel were pre-positioned in New York City on September 10, preparing to do a large scale simulation of a terrorist attack to be carried out on September 12? FEMA officials had already set up their command post at Pier 92 near the World Trade Center one day before the attacks.
Do you know that the 47-story Salomon Smith Barney Building, officially known as Seven World Trade Center, imploded at 5:20 in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, some nine hours after American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower? It took only about 6.5 seconds for the entire structure to fall straight down into itself, a half second more than the amount of time it would have taken a stone to hit the ground if you had dropped it from the roof in a vacuum. The collapse of Building Seven left a curiously small and tidy rubble pile, and the buildings to either side of it were relatively undamaged. It had not been hit by an airplane and had suffered only minor injuries to its structure when the Twin Towers collapsed.
Continues: http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
I wrote this book to save my family.
Scarlett, Paula, Kurt and Natasha Sonnenfeld
I would like to read the last few pages to you:
Continues: http://www.voltairenet.org/article160666.html
■オーストラリアの労働組合長が「911攻撃はテロ活動の結果ではなかった」と発言し、大きな波紋を呼んでいる
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/trades-hall-president-kevin-bracken-calls-911-conspiracy/story-e6frf7kx-1225941158523
VICTORIAN Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken remains unrepentant after his controversial comments about the 9/11 attacks made news around the world.
（時間の都合で、説明は後程に）
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/trades-hall-president-kevin-bracken-calls-911-conspiracy/story-e6frf7kx-1225941158523
VICTORIAN Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken remains unrepentant after his controversial comments about the 9/11 attacks made news around the world.
（時間の都合で、説明は後程に）
＜8＞の大体の内容です。
＜2010年10月21日の記事＞
昨日のJon FaineのABC トークバック（言い返す、の意味）番組の中でBracken氏は、攻撃はテロ活動の結果ではなかったと述べて激怒を引き起こした。
（911の）ストーリーは、科学的調査に耐えられない陰謀だったと彼は言う。
この発言は彼の職務（the president of the Trades Hall council、あるいはthe Maritime Union of Australia）とは無関係という。
昨日の番組で彼は馬鹿にされたとして＜Faine＞に対し「あなた自身のような臆病者達のせいで、この国の政治的な課題があまりにも長く引き伸ばされた」「いじめっ子に対して、あなたのように私は怖じ気づかない」と攻撃。
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
以上、リンク先の冒頭部分のいくつかを直訳しましたが、この彼の発言に対して否定的な反響が紹介され、例えば以下のような言い分が出ています。
「テロリズムに対抗する西側の努力のまさに心臓部を、この発言は叩いている。オーストラリアの兵隊がアフガニスタンで仕え、死んでいる状況の中で、 Bracken氏の突飛なコメントは彼らのアフガニスタンにおける存在理由を傷つけ、侮辱している」
なお、Bracken氏の発言は今回が初めてではなく、2006年にも「911の攻撃はアメリカ政府が何らかの形で関与していたからこそ成功した」「テロリズムを止めたいのなら、911の背後に本当に誰がいるのかを調べないといけない」「米軍・政府・保安部の中心部が参加していない限り起こりえなかったことだ。何もそれら全体が関わったとは言わないが、911政府見解は成立しないと信じている」などと述べていたようです。
＜2010年10月21日の記事＞
昨日のJon FaineのABC トークバック（言い返す、の意味）番組の中でBracken氏は、攻撃はテロ活動の結果ではなかったと述べて激怒を引き起こした。
（911の）ストーリーは、科学的調査に耐えられない陰謀だったと彼は言う。
この発言は彼の職務（the president of the Trades Hall council、あるいはthe Maritime Union of Australia）とは無関係という。
昨日の番組で彼は馬鹿にされたとして＜Faine＞に対し「あなた自身のような臆病者達のせいで、この国の政治的な課題があまりにも長く引き伸ばされた」「いじめっ子に対して、あなたのように私は怖じ気づかない」と攻撃。
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
以上、リンク先の冒頭部分のいくつかを直訳しましたが、この彼の発言に対して否定的な反響が紹介され、例えば以下のような言い分が出ています。
「テロリズムに対抗する西側の努力のまさに心臓部を、この発言は叩いている。オーストラリアの兵隊がアフガニスタンで仕え、死んでいる状況の中で、 Bracken氏の突飛なコメントは彼らのアフガニスタンにおける存在理由を傷つけ、侮辱している」
なお、Bracken氏の発言は今回が初めてではなく、2006年にも「911の攻撃はアメリカ政府が何らかの形で関与していたからこそ成功した」「テロリズムを止めたいのなら、911の背後に本当に誰がいるのかを調べないといけない」「米軍・政府・保安部の中心部が参加していない限り起こりえなかったことだ。何もそれら全体が関わったとは言わないが、911政府見解は成立しないと信じている」などと述べていたようです。
■女優でありコメディアンでもあるロザーナ（Roseanne Barr）が自分のブログの中で、Jon Goldによる911分析「事実がそれ自体を語る」（The Facts Speak For Themselves）について、「素晴らしい分析。是非読んで！」とファンに呼びかけています。
http://911truthnews.com/roseanne-barr-for-911-truth/
「事実がそれ自体を語る」（The Facts Speak For Themselves）
http://911truthnews.com/the-facts-speak-for-themselves/
ロザーナのブログ
http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/2010/10/brilliant-analysis-jon-gold.php
ロザーナは支持者からの感謝に応え、911がブッシュらの仕業であると見ている点などを、自ら書き込んでいます。
http://911truthnews.com/roseanne-barr-for-911-truth/
「事実がそれ自体を語る」（The Facts Speak For Themselves）
http://911truthnews.com/the-facts-speak-for-themselves/
ロザーナのブログ
http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/2010/10/brilliant-analysis-jon-gold.php
ロザーナは支持者からの感謝に応え、911がブッシュらの仕業であると見ている点などを、自ら書き込んでいます。
■ノーム・チョムスキー「アルカイダが9.11を実行したと言う証拠なし」
http://world911truth.org/noam-chomsky-no-evidence-that-al-qaeda-carried-out-the-911-attacks/
「ブッシュ政権がタリバンに対して証拠を示さなかったのは、それがなかったからだ」
「証拠がないという事実はFBIにより（事件後）8ヶ月に確認されたと、政治分析家は述べている」
「イギリスの高官は戦争に入る3週間前、アメリカとイギリスはアフガニスタン人民がタリバンを追い出すまで爆破を続けると述べ、これは後日、戦争の公式な正当性となった。これらは全て違法である。むしろ犯罪だ」
http://world911truth.org/noam-chomsky-no-evidence-that-al-qaeda-carried-out-the-911-attacks/
「ブッシュ政権がタリバンに対して証拠を示さなかったのは、それがなかったからだ」
「証拠がないという事実はFBIにより（事件後）8ヶ月に確認されたと、政治分析家は述べている」
「イギリスの高官は戦争に入る3週間前、アメリカとイギリスはアフガニスタン人民がタリバンを追い出すまで爆破を続けると述べ、これは後日、戦争の公式な正当性となった。これらは全て違法である。むしろ犯罪だ」
フェイス・ブックでJeff Pragerと名乗る人が次のような書き込みをしていました。
資料としてそのままコピーしておきます。
「911はブラック・イーグル・トラストを隠蔽するためだった。WTC1,2,6,7に９つの調査（資料）があった」という内容で、その９つの調査について説明しています。
---------------------------------------------------------------------
911 was about concealing the Black Eagle Trust. There were 9 investigations housed on Building 1, 2, 6 and 7. They were:
1) The Marcos Gold Hearing began in Los Angeles, in August 1997. The banks and accounts involved in that hearing, were the Swiss banks: UBS, and Bank Julius Baer.
2) The Eizenstatz Report and a public campaign waged by the Simon Wiesenthal Center launched suits against three Swiss banks.
3) The Reginald Howe suit - in which the U.S. bullion banks were accused of dumping U.S. Treasury gold on the market illegally. The Reginald Howe & GATA Lawsuit was filed on January 8th, 2000 naming Deutschebank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown), U.S. Treasury, Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve, Citibank and Chase, as defendants. Also mentioned as having non-public knowledge of the scheme are Gerald Corrigan and Barrick Gold. (The 2000 filing suggests investigations began long before.)
4) The Bank of New York money laundering scandal: the Department of Justice was under pressure to investigate accounts of multiple individuals who benefited from these transactions: Loutchansky, Marc Rich and Berezovsky (Berezovski). The FBI investigation started in the Fall of 1998, The investor lawsuit was opened in September 1999. These investigations involved accounts at Credit Suisse, Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS), Dresdner Bank, Westdeutsche Landesbank and Banque Internacionale of Luxembourg.All of these individual would at some point be mentioned as playing a role in the money laundering scandal at the Bank of New York, that would ultimately be reopened in 2002, after being buried for three years by federal prosecutor Mary Jo White, a first cousin to former President George Bush.
5) The Avisma law suit was filed August 19th, 1999 naming as defendants Bank Menatep, Harvard Institute for International Development, and the Bank of New York;
6) The federal investigation of Konanykhine’s European Union Bank: The Konanykhine investigation was begun by the INS in February 1999. Other banks included in that investigation would have been the European Union Bank and Bank Menatep.
7) Richard Giffen/Mobil Oil scandal - The FBI Probe began in 1999, and would have involved accounts at Credit Suisse, Bank of New York, Cayman Islands, and the Deutsche Bank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown).,
8) Yeltsin’s UBS accounts were being investigated for bribery.
9) Kevin Ingram would testify that he had advised Bob Graham in advance that the World Trade Center was to be attacked. This Deutsche Bank executive was convicted of laundering money for weapons purchases for Muslim terrorists through Pakistani agents; The Ingram investigation was begun by the FBI as early as July 1999, and involved the Deutschebank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown).
The records for these investigations resided in Building Six, Building Seven and on the 23rd Floor FBI office in the North Tower.
The account structure set up by the U.S. intelligence operations was besieged by investigations from nine different directions, any one of which may have exposed the source of that funding, and traced it to its Black Eagle Fund origins. Those investigations needed to be diverted. And they were, with 911.
資料としてそのままコピーしておきます。
「911はブラック・イーグル・トラストを隠蔽するためだった。WTC1,2,6,7に９つの調査（資料）があった」という内容で、その９つの調査について説明しています。
---------------------------------------------------------------------
911 was about concealing the Black Eagle Trust. There were 9 investigations housed on Building 1, 2, 6 and 7. They were:
1) The Marcos Gold Hearing began in Los Angeles, in August 1997. The banks and accounts involved in that hearing, were the Swiss banks: UBS, and Bank Julius Baer.
2) The Eizenstatz Report and a public campaign waged by the Simon Wiesenthal Center launched suits against three Swiss banks.
3) The Reginald Howe suit - in which the U.S. bullion banks were accused of dumping U.S. Treasury gold on the market illegally. The Reginald Howe & GATA Lawsuit was filed on January 8th, 2000 naming Deutschebank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown), U.S. Treasury, Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve, Citibank and Chase, as defendants. Also mentioned as having non-public knowledge of the scheme are Gerald Corrigan and Barrick Gold. (The 2000 filing suggests investigations began long before.)
4) The Bank of New York money laundering scandal: the Department of Justice was under pressure to investigate accounts of multiple individuals who benefited from these transactions: Loutchansky, Marc Rich and Berezovsky (Berezovski). The FBI investigation started in the Fall of 1998, The investor lawsuit was opened in September 1999. These investigations involved accounts at Credit Suisse, Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS), Dresdner Bank, Westdeutsche Landesbank and Banque Internacionale of Luxembourg.All of these individual would at some point be mentioned as playing a role in the money laundering scandal at the Bank of New York, that would ultimately be reopened in 2002, after being buried for three years by federal prosecutor Mary Jo White, a first cousin to former President George Bush.
5) The Avisma law suit was filed August 19th, 1999 naming as defendants Bank Menatep, Harvard Institute for International Development, and the Bank of New York;
6) The federal investigation of Konanykhine’s European Union Bank: The Konanykhine investigation was begun by the INS in February 1999. Other banks included in that investigation would have been the European Union Bank and Bank Menatep.
7) Richard Giffen/Mobil Oil scandal - The FBI Probe began in 1999, and would have involved accounts at Credit Suisse, Bank of New York, Cayman Islands, and the Deutsche Bank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown).,
8) Yeltsin’s UBS accounts were being investigated for bribery.
9) Kevin Ingram would testify that he had advised Bob Graham in advance that the World Trade Center was to be attacked. This Deutsche Bank executive was convicted of laundering money for weapons purchases for Muslim terrorists through Pakistani agents; The Ingram investigation was begun by the FBI as early as July 1999, and involved the Deutschebank (a.k.a. Deutschebank Alex Brown).
The records for these investigations resided in Building Six, Building Seven and on the 23rd Floor FBI office in the North Tower.
The account structure set up by the U.S. intelligence operations was besieged by investigations from nine different directions, any one of which may have exposed the source of that funding, and traced it to its Black Eagle Fund origins. Those investigations needed to be diverted. And they were, with 911.
- mixiユーザー
- ログインしてコメントしよう！
|
|
|
|
911再調査を要求する署名コミュ 更新情報
-
最新のアンケート
-
まだ何もありません
-
