Someone sent me this article/report/? what ever it is. They put a lot of time in to researching the data. I guess. Lets just assume this is all correct. Or not. After reading it I am conflicted. "So what" comes to mind for me personally since I am neither Jewish nor Muslim but.... we all bleed red. Anyway this seemed worth sharing. Food for thought.
Subject: ONE BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN JEWS AND MUSLIMS
The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000; that is
ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world's population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1988 - Najib Mahfooz
Peace:
1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1990 - Elias James Corey
1994 - Yaser Arafat:
1999 - Ahmed Zewai
Economics:
(zero)
Physics:
(zero)
Medicine:
1960 - Peter Brian Medawar
1998 - Ferid Mourad
TOTAL: 7 (SEVEN)
The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is FOURTEEN
MILLION or about 0.02% of the world's population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1910 - Paul Heyse
1927 - Henri Bergson
1958 - Boris Pasternak
1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 - Nelly Sachs
1976 - Saul Bellow
1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 - Elias Canetti
1987 - Joseph Brodsky
1991 - Nadine Gordimer
World Peace:
1911 - Alfred Fried
1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 - Rene Cassin
1973 - Henry Kissinger
1978 - Menachem Begin
1986 - Elie Wiesel
1994 - Shimon Peres
1994 - Yitzhak Rabin
Physics:
1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 - Henri Moissan
1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
1910 - Otto Wallach
1915 - Richard Willstaetter
1918 - Fritz Haber
1921 - Albert Einstein
1922 - Niels Bohr
1925 - James Franck
1925 - Gustav Hertz
1943 - Gustav Stern
1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 - Felix Bloch
1954 - Max Born
1958 - Igor Tamm
1959 - Emilio Segre
1960 - Donald A. Glaser
1961 - Robert Hofstadter
1961 - Melvin Calvin
1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 - Julian Schwinger
1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
1971 - Dennis Gabor
1972 - William Howard Stein
1973 - Brian David Josephson
1975 - Ben jamin Mottleson
1976 - Burton Richter
1977 - Ilya Prigogine
1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
1978 - Peter L Kapitza
1979 - Stephen Weinberg
1979 - Sheldon Glashow
1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
1980 - Paul Berg
1980 - Walter Gilbert
1981 - Roald Hoffmann
1982 - Aaron Klug
1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
1985 - Jerome Karle
1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 - Robert Huber
1988 - Leon Lederman
1988 - Melvin Schwartz
1988 - Jack Steinberger
1989 - Si dney Altman
1990 - Jerome Friedman
1992 - Rudolph Marc us
1995 - Martin Perl
2000 - Alan J. Heeger
Economics:
1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 - Simon Kuznets
1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
1976 - Milton Friedman
1978 - Herbert A. Simon
1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 - Franco Modigliani
1987 - Robert M. Solow
1990 - Harry Mark owitz
1990 - Merton Miller
1992 - Gary Becker
1993 - Robert Fogel
Medicine:
1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
1908 - Paul Erlich
1914 - Robert Barany
1922 - Otto Meyerhof
1930 - Karl Landsteiner
1931 - Otto Warburg
1936 - Otto Loewi
1944 - Joseph Erlanger
1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
1952 - Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 - Hans Krebs
1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 - Joshua Lederberg
1959 - Arthur Kornberg
1964 - Konrad Bloch
1965 - Francois Jacob
1965 - Andre Lwoff
1967 - George Wald
1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 - Salvador Luria
1970 - Julius Axelrod
1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 - Howard Martin Temin
1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 - Daniel Nathans
1980 - Baruj Ben cerraf
1984 - Cesar Milstein
1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 - Gertrude Elion
1989 - Harold Varmus
1991 - Erwin Neher
1991 - Bert Sakmann
1993 - Richard J. Roberts
1993 - Phillip Sharp
1994 - Alfred Gilman
1995 - Edward B. Lewis
1996- Lu Rose Iacovino
TOTAL: 129!
The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in military training
camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims. The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants.
There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church. There is NOT a single Jew who protests by killing people.
The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems.
Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before they demand that humankind respects them.
Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more culpability on Israel 's part, the following two sentences really say it all:
'If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel . Benjamin Netanyahu
General Eisenhower Warned Us
It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.
He did this because he said in words to this effect:
'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened'
Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.
It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended.
This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the, 6 million Jews, 20 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests who were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated' while the German people looked the other way.
Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others, claiming the Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.
How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center 'NEVER HAPPENED' because it offends some Muslim in the United States ?
|
|
|
|
コメント(50)
Orhan Pamuk won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2006. I think I read an interview of his where he identified himself as a Muslim, though I could be mistaken.
As for the "report" in question, if you genuinely found it to be "food for thought" instead of instantly recognizing it for the pile of BS that it is, then, well, words fail me. I mean, seriously.
>There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8465006.stm
>The Jews don't...have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Shapira
As for the "report" in question, if you genuinely found it to be "food for thought" instead of instantly recognizing it for the pile of BS that it is, then, well, words fail me. I mean, seriously.
>There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8465006.stm
>The Jews don't...have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Shapira
don't get me started on Australians! I walk out the door and it's like....well it's like they're everywhere.....I can't walk down the street without seeing them. Bloody Australians.....now Canadians, Australia would be a much better place if we kicked out all the Australians and filled the place up with Canadians.
@Ian
Just import Asia and the Middle East, slap a made in Canada label on it and there you go.
Think Australia is already Canada. Just need to convince them hockey is the coolest sport. Which should be self evident anyway!!
@さまそる
Yeah the majority of Jews go around destroying Churches. What a desperate wanker.
The A-rabs are chasing Christian scaredy ess out of the middle east. The German Pope was wanking on about that recently. The Jordanians have to protect their small Christian population. Lebanon Christians are emigrating anywhere except there. Say goodbye to Christians in the ME. The Jews in most of the ME was forced to leave for Israel or somewhere else. It will happen to Christians. Hahaha!
>The Jews don't...have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
First Jews don't use the word Infidels. They use the word Gyoim. Meaning "nations". Gyoim can also refer to Israel. Because it's also a nation.
And every Jew thinks they are the leader. For every two Jews, they will have three opinions. Probably disagreeing with themselves half the time. So ya talk with one shmo on the street doesn't exactly make that a trend. And who are you considering a "leader"?
OK i'll call for a boycott on mother's chicken soup and keeping our chicken soup recipe to ourselves. Oh how shocking...a conspiracy of minestrone proportions.
Actually that already exists. It's called Kosher Wine.
shocking shocking. Call up the wanker hotline. Call this new information in.
Just import Asia and the Middle East, slap a made in Canada label on it and there you go.
Think Australia is already Canada. Just need to convince them hockey is the coolest sport. Which should be self evident anyway!!
@さまそる
Yeah the majority of Jews go around destroying Churches. What a desperate wanker.
The A-rabs are chasing Christian scaredy ess out of the middle east. The German Pope was wanking on about that recently. The Jordanians have to protect their small Christian population. Lebanon Christians are emigrating anywhere except there. Say goodbye to Christians in the ME. The Jews in most of the ME was forced to leave for Israel or somewhere else. It will happen to Christians. Hahaha!
>The Jews don't...have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
First Jews don't use the word Infidels. They use the word Gyoim. Meaning "nations". Gyoim can also refer to Israel. Because it's also a nation.
And every Jew thinks they are the leader. For every two Jews, they will have three opinions. Probably disagreeing with themselves half the time. So ya talk with one shmo on the street doesn't exactly make that a trend. And who are you considering a "leader"?
OK i'll call for a boycott on mother's chicken soup and keeping our chicken soup recipe to ourselves. Oh how shocking...a conspiracy of minestrone proportions.
Actually that already exists. It's called Kosher Wine.
shocking shocking. Call up the wanker hotline. Call this new information in.
@Ian
I hope your not drinking anything or at least have a towel handy to wipe your monitor.
@aznatama
> Jesus was a Jew. lol
Did you learn that from watching BrokeBack Mountain?
The part about the Cousin J story that makes me cry bs is the part where he didn't have a wife.
Everyone had a wife back then. Absolutely everyone. Especially Jews. Most more than one!!
Where are the women? Where are the children. On famous painting of the passover table (Last Supper). All men, no women, no children.
Screams "gay porn"
And the crying, bitch'n, pissing, and moaning in the end. Dued no straight guy would write that.
I hope your not drinking anything or at least have a towel handy to wipe your monitor.
@aznatama
> Jesus was a Jew. lol
Did you learn that from watching BrokeBack Mountain?
The part about the Cousin J story that makes me cry bs is the part where he didn't have a wife.
Everyone had a wife back then. Absolutely everyone. Especially Jews. Most more than one!!
Where are the women? Where are the children. On famous painting of the passover table (Last Supper). All men, no women, no children.
Screams "gay porn"
And the crying, bitch'n, pissing, and moaning in the end. Dued no straight guy would write that.
30>>
That's a good (& deep!) question.
My own initial reaction is yes. Without a doubt it would solve many, or
at least some, of the worlds tensions. Just by virtue of the fact that
there would be something less to argue & fight about.
However, I think the obvious negative side would be something
else, a belief mechanism or maybe something totally different,
filling the space left by defunkt religion.
That's a good (& deep!) question.
My own initial reaction is yes. Without a doubt it would solve many, or
at least some, of the worlds tensions. Just by virtue of the fact that
there would be something less to argue & fight about.
However, I think the obvious negative side would be something
else, a belief mechanism or maybe something totally different,
filling the space left by defunkt religion.
I'm not really so sure.....I mean ever since the fence was invented it's been about "this is mine, hands off". Wars will be fought over anything....and if there isn't a good reason people will just settle for a stupid reason.
I was actually talking to a guy from Serbia and he said 'there will always be conflict in the Balkans because the people are all crazy'....I'm quoting him....'they all know about the time 200 or 300 years ago when that family or that village did such and such to them and even though 300 years has passed they still harbor this deep resentment'.
I was actually talking to a guy from Serbia and he said 'there will always be conflict in the Balkans because the people are all crazy'....I'm quoting him....'they all know about the time 200 or 300 years ago when that family or that village did such and such to them and even though 300 years has passed they still harbor this deep resentment'.
hello.
though i havent understood all parts of this article, i just wondered if this one is a simple insult for muslims. the purpose of this is just to stop an increase of them and make people consider how israeli feels...
i guess that she/he is still a child or young student since the writer only has a limited view. jewish side is emphasized in a gond way.
what does he want us to feed my brain by this?
though i havent understood all parts of this article, i just wondered if this one is a simple insult for muslims. the purpose of this is just to stop an increase of them and make people consider how israeli feels...
i guess that she/he is still a child or young student since the writer only has a limited view. jewish side is emphasized in a gond way.
what does he want us to feed my brain by this?
@Ｊ美ー
> It's just racist bullshit
There is no Jewish race.
There is no Muslim race.
And Jews generally don't own camels. So how can a race be conducted?
@chicac
And doubt anyone believes they'd ever agree on the race's rules.
What Ｊ美ー should be saying is the article serves no useful purpose.
> It's just racist bullshit
There is no Jewish race.
There is no Muslim race.
And Jews generally don't own camels. So how can a race be conducted?
@chicac
And doubt anyone believes they'd ever agree on the race's rules.
What Ｊ美ー should be saying is the article serves no useful purpose.
I always find it interesting how people will find different reasons to hate. Even when they are 100% the same like in North and South Korea. You even hate me for forwarding this article.
But it did get the desired effect. I wanted to just feel that it was BS but it had some points that were convincing. Some of you sound like you are in denial. Even if you never read this ( because I never posted it;) it was still in circulation so you might as well see whats floating around out there ( like turds in the water) just in case you wanted to defend your principles, or whatever. And for who ever doesnt want to read it, you can just visit some other link that is more to your liking.
But it did get the desired effect. I wanted to just feel that it was BS but it had some points that were convincing. Some of you sound like you are in denial. Even if you never read this ( because I never posted it;) it was still in circulation so you might as well see whats floating around out there ( like turds in the water) just in case you wanted to defend your principles, or whatever. And for who ever doesnt want to read it, you can just visit some other link that is more to your liking.
@aznatama (42)
> I have not watched bbm, but apparently you have.
Wow what a dorky thing to write. What are you looking for a "And i know you are but what am i." reply?! Cheesy...
> Are you homophobic？gay and straight are societal constructs.
societal constructs?!
wtf? No society (except maybe Rome) considers gays a basic necessity for forming a society.
A citizen...Yes
A couple that produces children...Yes
Immigrants for cheap labor...Maybe
Stretching a bit far...you could argue without gays, any military would be hurting for soldiers. But militarys' aren't exactly coming out (
) and saying, "Wow we need gay people otherwise how'd we defend our heterosexuals?" Although that would make a great theonion.com video clip.
The Cousin J story is fictitious. Cuz ALL Jewish men during that time period were married.
> I have not watched bbm, but apparently you have.
Wow what a dorky thing to write. What are you looking for a "And i know you are but what am i." reply?! Cheesy...
> Are you homophobic？gay and straight are societal constructs.
societal constructs?!
wtf? No society (except maybe Rome) considers gays a basic necessity for forming a society.
A citizen...Yes
A couple that produces children...Yes
Immigrants for cheap labor...Maybe
Stretching a bit far...you could argue without gays, any military would be hurting for soldiers. But militarys' aren't exactly coming out (
) and saying, "Wow we need gay people otherwise how'd we defend our heterosexuals?" Although that would make a great theonion.com video clip.
The Cousin J story is fictitious. Cuz ALL Jewish men during that time period were married.
#35 Dave Chappelle is so funny!
I would imagine that some intelligent counter arguments would be the way to deal with this type of article. Not just saying that its racist bullshit. Defend your opinion about this topic and the author if you can. That is all I was expecting. We need to explain why we don`t agree with certain points that are made.. etc.. Some posters did just that but some still reverted to attacking the messenger. I don`t think anyone has the right to take offense with me for
posting this ( what I thought was an interesting if not accurate, politically incorrect ) article.
Hard to believe everything you read in Wikipedia since anyone can edit the content.
I would imagine that some intelligent counter arguments would be the way to deal with this type of article. Not just saying that its racist bullshit. Defend your opinion about this topic and the author if you can. That is all I was expecting. We need to explain why we don`t agree with certain points that are made.. etc.. Some posters did just that but some still reverted to attacking the messenger. I don`t think anyone has the right to take offense with me for
posting this ( what I thought was an interesting if not accurate, politically incorrect ) article.
Hard to believe everything you read in Wikipedia since anyone can edit the content.
＠ハモンド星人
Konichiwa bitchez
Commentary on the video. Talk about missed opportunity.
The Jews would almost pick someone. An argument erupts within their own delegation. Ages pass. 10,000 years later. As everyone waited for their pick. Every other delegation became extinct. Solving the problem of who they would pick.
***********************************
One more time.
There is no Jewish nor Muslim nor Christian races.
And this is Japan. There is no such thing as racial discrimination here. Ask any Japanese person. So get over it!
Konichiwa bitchez
Commentary on the video. Talk about missed opportunity.
The Jews would almost pick someone. An argument erupts within their own delegation. Ages pass. 10,000 years later. As everyone waited for their pick. Every other delegation became extinct. Solving the problem of who they would pick.
***********************************
One more time.
There is no Jewish nor Muslim nor Christian races.
And this is Japan. There is no such thing as racial discrimination here. Ask any Japanese person. So get over it!
@ｽﾝｽﾞﾛｺﾞｳﾓｳ
> same humans
That's at least a counter argument.
@TokyoOG
Agreed. People grow a backbone!
Not only is the "race" thing a cop-out. From a Jews or a Muslims perspective, it makes whoever says it sound like their history education encompassed at most 30-40 years.
Also i heard an Israeli girl state the same argument as the article. It's a nationalist argument. My nation is better than your nation. Like Canadians dissing Americans. And Americans replying "oh you mean the Americans up north". I get sick of listening to both groups.
So that's why i stated instead of going down the nationalistic path. Choose a different strategy. Attack polygamy. That's an argument you can win and most nation would agree with.
> same humans
That's at least a counter argument.
@TokyoOG
Agreed. People grow a backbone!
Not only is the "race" thing a cop-out. From a Jews or a Muslims perspective, it makes whoever says it sound like their history education encompassed at most 30-40 years.
Also i heard an Israeli girl state the same argument as the article. It's a nationalist argument. My nation is better than your nation. Like Canadians dissing Americans. And Americans replying "oh you mean the Americans up north". I get sick of listening to both groups.
So that's why i stated instead of going down the nationalistic path. Choose a different strategy. Attack polygamy. That's an argument you can win and most nation would agree with.
>デイブ
I couldn't elaborate since I was on a keitai.
You were the one who started with the brokeback comment and the gay porn. Women were seen as significantly below men in social standing back then, and thus did not appear in many artworks. Keep in mind that the last supper was painted from one's imagination, and I don't think it was meant to be an accurate depiction of the scene, if it had actually happened.
What I meant about social constructs was not the actual homosexual, but the signs of a homosexual. ie, pink =feminine, blue = masculine. Before, it was the opposite. Make-up is associated with only females, in the past, men wore more make-up than women. wigs, same thing. etc etc. Society constructs what they deem "feminine and masculine" and label persons who do the opposite as homosexuals. Man wearing high-heels, make-up, and a dress... one casually identifies him as "gay."
Regardless, this is getting off topic.
I couldn't elaborate since I was on a keitai.
You were the one who started with the brokeback comment and the gay porn. Women were seen as significantly below men in social standing back then, and thus did not appear in many artworks. Keep in mind that the last supper was painted from one's imagination, and I don't think it was meant to be an accurate depiction of the scene, if it had actually happened.
What I meant about social constructs was not the actual homosexual, but the signs of a homosexual. ie, pink =feminine, blue = masculine. Before, it was the opposite. Make-up is associated with only females, in the past, men wore more make-up than women. wigs, same thing. etc etc. Society constructs what they deem "feminine and masculine" and label persons who do the opposite as homosexuals. Man wearing high-heels, make-up, and a dress... one casually identifies him as "gay."
Regardless, this is getting off topic.
@aznatama
Many of the commenters on this thread were hitting out at Jews. Mostly with one liners from Christianity or just nonsense (like the "race" thing. South Park. Whatever an atheist has to say).
I just ripped into those one liners (ignoring Cartman's comment. It's a comedy. I get that. Don't find it funny, but that's South Park.).
But come on!! Still think the backbone comment stands. When someone says Cousin J is fictitious and gay. You'd think a few people would come to Cousin J's defense?! Even just out of spite. Everyone can be spiteful. Get into it already!
Think most people would think any argument that includes the phrase "social constructs" isn't a convincing argument. You could be absolutely brilliant. Completely right. And your argument incredibly persuasive. But think you lost the beer swigging public. You ain't selling movies by throwing out phrases like "social constructs" (or listing the number of noble prizes Jews and Muslims have received).
Back to the Last Supper painting. When anyone pictures Cousin J, that painting comes to mind. And the (cultured) German Pope has done squat to rid his organization of the pedophile gay priests. Everyone is universally pissed about that.
Tie the pedophile gay priests with any one liners Christianity can throw out. And universally everyone will be skeptical of those one liners.
So when i say, "Look Cousin J is gay."
Or "Cousin J was made up by the Romans."
Look here is the proof.
I don't have to be right. Just have to make a persuasive argument to an already skeptical audience.
Many of the commenters on this thread were hitting out at Jews. Mostly with one liners from Christianity or just nonsense (like the "race" thing. South Park. Whatever an atheist has to say).
I just ripped into those one liners (ignoring Cartman's comment. It's a comedy. I get that. Don't find it funny, but that's South Park.).
But come on!! Still think the backbone comment stands. When someone says Cousin J is fictitious and gay. You'd think a few people would come to Cousin J's defense?! Even just out of spite. Everyone can be spiteful. Get into it already!
Think most people would think any argument that includes the phrase "social constructs" isn't a convincing argument. You could be absolutely brilliant. Completely right. And your argument incredibly persuasive. But think you lost the beer swigging public. You ain't selling movies by throwing out phrases like "social constructs" (or listing the number of noble prizes Jews and Muslims have received).
Back to the Last Supper painting. When anyone pictures Cousin J, that painting comes to mind. And the (cultured) German Pope has done squat to rid his organization of the pedophile gay priests. Everyone is universally pissed about that.
Tie the pedophile gay priests with any one liners Christianity can throw out. And universally everyone will be skeptical of those one liners.
So when i say, "Look Cousin J is gay."
Or "Cousin J was made up by the Romans."
Look here is the proof.
I don't have to be right. Just have to make a persuasive argument to an already skeptical audience.
- mixiユーザー
- ログインしてコメントしよう！
|
|
|
|
☆ENGLISH ONLY☆ 更新情報
-
最新のアンケート
