こんな感じで使ってみた。
Please review the sentence.
It is commonly said that Economic sanctions are very effective to stop some countries disturb world peace. This is because a lot of countries are affected by globalization. However, it may not be useful for communist countries, and the judge tends to be from developed countries.
First, more and more countries have been globalized, and they depend on other countries. If they cannot have enough trade from other countries, it will have a bad effect on the economy in their countries. Therefore, it becomes a useful foreign policy tool.
On the other hand, there are communist countries, which have the act of producing in their own countries. In these countries, if they get economic sanctions, they will continue their bad behavior. For example, North Koria still keeps threatening other countries by using missiles.
Furthermore, the judge is always from developed countries, especially America. It is unfair that only a few strong countries can have the power to judge other countries.
In conclusion, economic sanctions are very useful for a lot of countries to stop bad habits. However, some countries produce in their own countries, so they don’t have damage from the sanctions. In addition, few big countries can do it, so it is not fair. This is also a problem.
Here is the revised sentence:
↓
chat gpt answered
"It is often said that economic sanctions can be effective in curbing certain countries from disrupting world peace, especially since many countries are impacted by globalization. However, their effectiveness may be limited when it comes to communist countries, and the decision-making process is often dominated by developed nations. As globalization has increased, many countries have become reliant on trade with other nations, making economic sanctions a useful foreign policy tool. On the other hand, communist countries that produce domestically are less affected by such sanctions and may continue with their disruptive behavior, as seen in the case of North Korea. Moreover, the decision to impose economic sanctions is usually made by developed nations, particularly the United States, which raises questions about fairness and the balance of power. In conclusion, while economic sanctions can be effective in some cases, they are not without limitations and the fairness of their application remains a concern."
↓
Where did you change from my sentence?
Here's a summary of the changes I made to your sentence:
Changed the wording to more accurately reflect the ideas being expressed.
Reorganized the sentence structure to make the text easier to understand.
Used more precise vocabulary, such as "curbing" instead of "stopping."
Corrected grammar and spelling errors.
Clarified the statement about the decision-making process for economic sanctions being dominated by developed nations.
Added a conclusion that summarizes the main points made in the text.
↓
質問を変えてみた。
Please review the sentence, but do not change this sentence form. If you find some errors, please change other words better than the first sentence.
It is commonly said that Economic sanctions are very effective to stop some countries disturb world peace. This is because a lot of countries are affected by globalization. However, it may not be useful for communist countries, and the judge tends to be from developed countries.
First, more and more countries have been globalized, and they depend on other countries. If they cannot have enough trade from other countries, it will have a bad effect on the economy in their countries. Therefore, it becomes a useful foreign policy tool.
On the other hand, there are communist countries, which have the act of producing in their own countries. In these countries, if they get economic sanctions, they will continue their bad behavior. For example, North Koria still keeps threatening other countries by using missiles.
Furthermore, the judge is always from developed countries, especially America. It is unfair that only a few strong countries can have the power to judge other countries.
In conclusion, economic sanctions are very useful for a lot of countries to stop bad habits. However, some countries produce in their own countries, so they don’t have damage from the sanctions. In addition, few big countries can do it, so it is not fair. This is also a problem.
Here is the revised sentence:
↓
chat gpt answered
"Economic sanctions are often considered an effective way of preventing some countries from disrupting world peace, as many nations are impacted by globalization. However, the effectiveness of sanctions may be limited when it comes to communist countries, and the decision-making process is often dominated by developed nations. As more and more countries become globalized and rely on other nations for trade, economic sanctions can serve as a useful foreign policy tool. Meanwhile, communist countries that produce domestically may not be impacted by such sanctions and continue their disruptive behavior, as demonstrated by North Korea. Furthermore, decisions on economic sanctions are typically made by developed nations, particularly the United States, raising concerns about fairness and the balance of power. In conclusion, economic sanctions can be effective in many cases but may not be equally effective for all countries and can also raise questions about fairness."
↓
どの辺がエラーか聞いてみた
Please tell me where is error.
There are a few errors in the original sentence:
"It is commonly said that Economic sanctions are very effective to stop some countries disturb world peace." - "Disturb" should be "disturbing."
"North Koria still keeps threatening other countries by using missiles." - "North Koria" should be "North Korea."
"In addition, few big countries can do it, so it is not fair." - The meaning of this sentence is unclear. It could benefit from further clarification or rephrasing.
質問の仕方によって添削方法も変わり、作られる文も違うものになる。
使う側が使われるのではなく、使う側が理解して使えるかどうかが重要。
ログインしてコメントを確認・投稿する