英語★できる人＆勉強してる人コミュの究極の選択

早稲田の国際教養の英作文
20歳の貧乏と60歳の金持ちなるならどっちがいい？
皆さんならどっちを選びますか？

コメント(6)

最初
全て
最新の40件

I would prefer to be twenty years old with little money because youth provides time and potential, which are more valuable than wealth. A young person can change careers, learn new skills, and even recover from failure. In contrast, a wealthy sixty-year-old has financial security but fewer opportunities to start something new. Moreover, having limited money often motivates people to work harder and think creatively. Many successful individuals began their lives without financial support but achieved their goals through effort. Admittedly, money brings comfort and stability, especially in terms of health and daily life. However, I believe that time and the ability to shape one’s future are far more important than immediate financial security.

[3] mixiユーザー 03月05日 22:57

I think it would be much better to be 60 years old and be financially very well off. This
is because, from the age of around 60, most people are not as physically strong or energetic, and if they have not reached financial stability, they may end up living and dying in poverty. This is especially true in today’s society when people cannot afford to have many children to look after them in their old age. Having wealth ensures one’s dignity and the ability to live a meaningful life without depending on others.

[5] mixiユーザー 03月05日 22:58

I think it would be better to be 20 years old and have very little money because without money, a person needs to use all his or her senses to think of ways to get by in the world. They can learn to live simply and honestly while building resilience and creativity. It is also important to understand that money is not necessary to live a meaningful life; in most cases, having a lot of money only leads to excessive greed and unhappiness rather than true fulfillment.

ログインすると、みんなのコメントがもっと見れるよ