ログインしてさらにmixiを楽しもう

コメントを投稿して情報交換!
更新通知を受け取って、最新情報をゲット!

Michiko Kakutaniコミュの(51)TERRORIST

  • mixiチェック
  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
June 6, 2006
BOOKS OF THE TIMES
John Updike's 'Terrorist' Imagines a Homegrown Threat to Homeland Security
By MICHIKO KAKUTANI

TERRORIST
By John Updike
310 pages. Alfred A. Knopf. $24.95.

John Updike writing about terrorism? The bard of the middle-class mundane, the chronicler of suburban adultery and angst, tackling Islamic radicalism and the call to jihad?
In theory Mr. Updike's shopworn new novel, "Terrorist," not only gives him an opportunity to address a thoroughly topical subject but also represents an effort to stretch his imagination ・ to try to boldly go where he has never gone before, as he did with considerable 駘an in his African novel, "The Coup" (1978), and with decidedly less happy results in "Brazil," his misbegotten 1994 variation of the Tristan and Iseult legend.
At the same time, it offers Mr. Updike a chance to explore some of his perennial themes from a different angle: to look at the sexually permissive mores that his other characters have embraced through the disapproving eyes of an ascetic, religious man, and to contemplate this man's absolute and unwavering faith, which is so unlike the existential doubts and tentative yearnings for salvation evinced by Mr. Updike's earlier creations.
Unfortunately, the would-be terrorist in this novel turns out to be a completely unbelievable individual: more robot than human being and such a clich・that the reader cannot help suspecting that Mr. Updike found the idea of such a person so incomprehensible that he at some point abandoned any earnest attempt to depict his inner life and settled instead for giving us a static, one-dimensional stereotype.
"Terrorist" possesses none of the metaphysical depth of classic novelistic musings on revolutionaries like "The Secret Agent," "The Possessed" or "The Princess Casamassima," and none of the staccato, sociological brilliance of more recent fictional forays into this territory, like Don DeLillo's "Mao II."
For that matter, the journalistic portraits of the 9/11 hijackers that Terry McDermott of The Los Angeles Times pieced together ・from interviews with acquaintances of the hijackers, "The 9/11 Commission Report" and material from interrogations of captured terrorists ・in his 2005 book "Perfect Soldiers" are a hundred times more fascinating, more nuanced and more psychologically intriguing than the cartoonish stick figure named Ahmad whom Mr. Updike has created in these pages.
Ahmad, we quickly learn, is the only child of an Irish-American nurse's aide and her Egyptian husband, who decamped a few years after his son's birth. Ahmad is now a senior at a public high school in a fading industrial town in New Jersey; he plays soccer in the fall and runs track in the spring. Despite his decent grades, he has recently switched from the college track to the vocational one: after graduation, he plans to become a truck driver ・at the behest of his mentor, the imam at the local mosque, where Ahmad has been studying the Koran. His high school guidance counselor, Jack Levy, finds this career choice more than a little perplexing.
At 18, Ahmad is a virgin and expresses a deep disgust with sex. He rails against the decadence and dissipation he sees around him: the skimpily dressed girls at school, his mother's blowzy attire, the lewd and lascivious words he hears on the radio and the television. He declares that he seeks "to walk the Straight Path" ・something that is not easy to do, he thinks, in a country where "there are too many paths, too much selling of many useless things." He is given to saying things like "the American way is the way of infidels," and the country "is headed for a terrible doom." Or: "Purity is its own end." Or: "I thirst for Paradise."
In other words, Ahmad talks not like a teenager who was born and grew up in New Jersey but like an Islamic terrorist in a bad action-adventure movie, or someone who has been brainwashed and programmed to spout jihadist clich駸. Much of the time he sounds like someone who has learned English as a second language.
Mr. Updike does an equally lousy job of showing us why Ahmad is willing to die and kill for jihad. We're told that the imam who teaches Ahmad the Koran has become a surrogate father to the fatherless boy. We're told that Ahmad is disgusted with his flirtatious mother and her succession of boyfriends. And we're told that he wants a mission in life and can't think of anything else he wants to do after high school.
None of these factors explain why Ahmad blindly follows the imam's directives and seems to have no will of his own. None of them explain why he has reached 18 without making a single close friend or seriously dating a single girl. And none of them explain why this supposedly gentle soul, who goes out of his way not to step on an innocent bug, gives no thought at all to the hundreds ・perhaps thousands ・of people he would kill were his suicide mission to succeed.
Ahmad's relationship with his mother is defined solely by his contempt for her casual sexual mores. Mr. Updike gives us no sense of their day-to-day relationship or the emotional history they have shared for nearly two decades, the sort of thing he has done so effortlessly with characters in earlier novels. Nor does he show why Ahmad's mother, self-absorbed as she may be, hasn't wondered about her son's growing religious fervor or his desire to learn how to drive large trucks filled with hazardous materials, particularly when all this is happening in the wake of 9/11.
Though Mr. Updike manages to extract a fair amount of suspense from Ahmad's story, he does so with the heavy reliance on unbelievable coincidence. Ahmad's mother will begin an affair with his high school guidance counselor, who happens to be married to a woman whose sister works for the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, who is worried about a terrorist plot being hatched in the very New Jersey town where Ahmad happens to live. Needless to say, the ensuing developments in this maladroit novel prove to be every bit as dubious as Ahmad is as a recognizable human being.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/06/books/06kaku.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

コメント(4)

ジョン・アップダイク氏の新作です。”Terrorist”。

主人公のAhmad Mulloyは、失踪したエジプト人の父と、ヒッピーのような生活をしていたアイリッシュ・アメリカ人の母の間に生まれた18歳の高校生。高校では秋にはサッカーをして春は陸上競技の選手として活躍し、成績も悪くはなく、とても潔癖な性格だ。そんな彼がイスラム教の導師に説得され、トンネル爆破のテロを実行しようとする……という本だそうです。

Kakutaniさんの本書に対する批判の一つは主人公が人間らしく描けていないという点で、これを読んだ読者は著者が主人公の内面を真摯に描写することを放棄し、その代わりに血の通わない一面的なステレオタイプを提供することで手打ちしているように感じるだろうと言っています。

むしろTerry McDermott氏がハイジャッカーたちの知り合いをインタヴューして書いた“The 9/11 Commission Report” や、逮捕したテロリストの尋問をもとにして編んだ“Perfect Soldiers” の方が、100倍よろしいとのこと。

“The 9/11Commission Report” は、http://www.faqs.org/docs/911/911Report.html で全文読めます。

また、Kakutaniさんは著者はAhmadの導師が、彼のいわば代理父になることや、Ahmadがふしだらな母親を嫌っているということは描くものの、彼らの間の日常生活レベルでの交流、20年にわたる母と息子の歴史が描写されていず、なぜ18歳にもなる男の子がそれまでの人生で一人も親しくできる友達がいなくて、真面目に付き合えるガールフレンドもいなかったのか、また恐らく優しい心を持っている主人公がなぜ多数を殺すことになるテロに身を捧げたのかということをちゃんと説明していないと言います。

NY Timesのインタヴューで、アップダイク氏は本書についてこのように語っています。

"I think I felt I could understand the animosity and hatred which an Islamic believer would have for our system. Nobody's trying to see it from that point of view. I guess I have stuck my neck out here in a number of ways, but that's what writers are for, maybe."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/31/books/31updi.html?n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fU%2fUpdike%2c%20John

New York Magazineの書評を見てみると。。。

アップダイク氏は本書で、ドストエフスキーの系譜に連なる作家たちのように“the lunatic of one idea” の説明を試みている……
この本の登場人物の描写は輪郭だけに留まり、行動もおざなりにしか描写されていないものの、主人公は我々の中の澱のようなものを、かき乱す。またアップダイクのようにコーランを丁寧に読んで反映させる作家もそういない。という風に紹介されてますが。
褒めてるのか褒めてないのかよく分からない…… 

http://newyorkmetro.com/arts/books/reviews/17120/index1.html
なるほど、アメリカエスタブリッシュメントに位置してそこで老いるジョン・アップダイク氏に対するカクタニさんの、辛辣且つ正当とも思える批評のよって来るところは「文学的」にではありつつもエキゾチックな異文化は受け入れられるもののいくら開けたといってもパックスアメリカーナに安住する作家の態度ではないか、とも読まれそうなカクタニさんがどのような経緯で批評の場に入ったのか知らない者にはその角度に興味がいきます。

文明の衝突といわれて説明されてきた様々な闘争がつまるところイスラム世界の現代資本主義の正義の巨人に対する蟷螂の斧ともとられかねない昨今、もしあれば前世紀から今世紀に続く戦争の歴史を参照したカクタニさんの書き物を拝見したいものです。
そうですね。この書評では主人公の描き方が浅いという点と、小説に出てくる都合の良い偶然が不自然だという点を批判しているので、特にアップダイク氏の態度への批判というわけではないと思いますが、そう取られても仕方ないのかも。。。
というか、私の紹介の仕方のせいかもしれません(ヒヤ汗)。。すみません、その辺は読み分けて下さい!

Kakutani女史は文芸や美術が専門の書評家であって評論家ではないので、歴史や政治についての書評は比較的少ないですね。そういう本は専属書評家(Kakutaniさん以外には映画評論家と食べ物評論家がいます)ではなく外部の専門家が単発で書くことが多いです。ただ、イラク問題についてはKakutaniさんはよくカバーしていて書評しているのですが…私が億劫がってご紹介していないのです。。

あと、適当なペースで好きな本を選択してトピックを立ててしまってますが、気にせず何でもトピック立ててくださいね。
そこまで入れあげるろるさんに興味がいくのですが、読みわけ能力の乏しい者には原文だけで充分です。

文芸や美術の専門の書評家が評論家であるのは自明のこと、書かれたものにはその人の世界観が現れているもの、そこに興味をもったものです。 専門を押し出すと足をすくわれることもあるものです。 そういうものの壷中の空からの見方に狡猾、百戦練磨の専門家から揶揄させるのかもしれませんね。

ログインすると、みんなのコメントがもっと見れるよ

mixiユーザー
ログインしてコメントしよう!

Michiko Kakutani 更新情報

Michiko Kakutaniのメンバーはこんなコミュニティにも参加しています

星印の数は、共通して参加しているメンバーが多いほど増えます。

人気コミュニティランキング