Adolescent Virginity Pledges, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Young Adults
本文の字数制限のために、結論部分のみを掲載します。詳しくはリンクをご覧下さい。
この論文は、「純潔の誓い」を行った若者としなかった若者との性感染症（STD)の感染率を調査したものである。結果としてコンドーム使用すれば、性感染症を予防できるというのは、全くの妄想で、効果がない。また、「純潔の誓い」を行った若者は、それ以外の若者と比較して、感染率は２５％（感染率が低い）という結果が出ている。
すなわち、『性感染症を防ぐ目的ならば、コンドームに頼る、唯物性教育は無意味であり、それ以上に、人格教育に根付いた「純潔の誓い」を行った方が、自己抑制教育同様、はるかに、効果が高い』という結果である。
現在、米国では、5人に一人がＨＩＶ以外の性感染症であると言われ、深刻な状況下にある。
http://
この統計は性解放グループの捏造報道に関してヘリテージ財団がさらに詳細に再調査した結果である。
http://
Conclusion
The analysis of Bearman and Bruckner indicating that virginity pledgers have the same STD rates as non-pledgers has garnered widespread media and political attention. However, the same methods used by Bearman and Bruckner to analyze virginity pledges also show that condom use has no effect in reducing STD’s. This clearly illustrates the serious limitations of Bearman and Bruckner’s methodology.
The paper has shown that taking a virginity pledge in adolescence, in fact, is associated with a substantial decline in STD rates in young adult years. Across a broad array of analysis, virginity pledging was found to be a better predictor of STD reduction than was condom use. Individuals who took a virginity pledge in adolescence are some 25 percent less likely to have an STD as young adults, when compared with non-pledgers who are identical in race, gender, and family background. The reduction in STD’s for virginity pledgers occurs despite the fact that many years may have elapsed between the time the individual took a virginity pledge and the time that the STD rate was measured. Moreover, after initially taking a pledge, relatively few virginity pledgers will have received continuing social support for their commitment to abstinence.
Other research has shown that, when compared to non-pledgers of similar backgrounds, individuals who have taken a virginity pledge are:
* Less likely to have children out-of-wedlock;
* Less likely to experience teen pregnancy;
* Less likely to give birth as teens or young adults;
* Less likely to have sex before age 18; and,
* Less likely to engage in non-marital sex as young adults.
Pledgers will have fewer lifetime sexual partners than non-pledgers, and pledgers engaging in sexual activity in young adult years are as likely to use contraceptives as are non-pledgers.
Virginity pledge and similar abstinence education programs are among the few forces in our society pushing back against a tide of sexual permissiveness. These efforts need to be strengthened and expanded.
本文の字数制限のために、結論部分のみを掲載します。詳しくはリンクをご覧下さい。
この論文は、「純潔の誓い」を行った若者としなかった若者との性感染症（STD)の感染率を調査したものである。結果としてコンドーム使用すれば、性感染症を予防できるというのは、全くの妄想で、効果がない。また、「純潔の誓い」を行った若者は、それ以外の若者と比較して、感染率は２５％（感染率が低い）という結果が出ている。
すなわち、『性感染症を防ぐ目的ならば、コンドームに頼る、唯物性教育は無意味であり、それ以上に、人格教育に根付いた「純潔の誓い」を行った方が、自己抑制教育同様、はるかに、効果が高い』という結果である。
現在、米国では、5人に一人がＨＩＶ以外の性感染症であると言われ、深刻な状況下にある。
http://
この統計は性解放グループの捏造報道に関してヘリテージ財団がさらに詳細に再調査した結果である。
http://
Conclusion
The analysis of Bearman and Bruckner indicating that virginity pledgers have the same STD rates as non-pledgers has garnered widespread media and political attention. However, the same methods used by Bearman and Bruckner to analyze virginity pledges also show that condom use has no effect in reducing STD’s. This clearly illustrates the serious limitations of Bearman and Bruckner’s methodology.
The paper has shown that taking a virginity pledge in adolescence, in fact, is associated with a substantial decline in STD rates in young adult years. Across a broad array of analysis, virginity pledging was found to be a better predictor of STD reduction than was condom use. Individuals who took a virginity pledge in adolescence are some 25 percent less likely to have an STD as young adults, when compared with non-pledgers who are identical in race, gender, and family background. The reduction in STD’s for virginity pledgers occurs despite the fact that many years may have elapsed between the time the individual took a virginity pledge and the time that the STD rate was measured. Moreover, after initially taking a pledge, relatively few virginity pledgers will have received continuing social support for their commitment to abstinence.
Other research has shown that, when compared to non-pledgers of similar backgrounds, individuals who have taken a virginity pledge are:
* Less likely to have children out-of-wedlock;
* Less likely to experience teen pregnancy;
* Less likely to give birth as teens or young adults;
* Less likely to have sex before age 18; and,
* Less likely to engage in non-marital sex as young adults.
Pledgers will have fewer lifetime sexual partners than non-pledgers, and pledgers engaging in sexual activity in young adult years are as likely to use contraceptives as are non-pledgers.
Virginity pledge and similar abstinence education programs are among the few forces in our society pushing back against a tide of sexual permissiveness. These efforts need to be strengthened and expanded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ヘリテージ財団 更新情報
-
最新のイベント
-
まだ何もありません
-
-
最新のアンケート
-
まだ何もありません
-
