ログインしてさらにmixiを楽しもう

コメントを投稿して情報交換!
更新通知を受け取って、最新情報をゲット!

☆NihonJack⇔日本ジャック☆コミュのWow

  • mixiチェック
  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

Wow

Now I can understand the need for real English teachers for ESL.

*********************************
Hello ! Today I have a question.
Would you please help me !

○He bought a book for me.
×He bought a book to me.

In Japnese 彼は私に本を買ってくれた。「に」= "To".
WHY "For" not "To"? Please teach it to me!
(in this case, "To" is right, isn't it?)
*********************************

The purpose of this question is not to test your grammar.
This question is to test your vocabulary.
The question sees if you know the difference between the words "Bought" and "Brought"
"He bought a book for me." Bought = past tense of "Buy."
"He brought a book to me." Brought = past tense of "Bring."
It has nothing to do with "For" or "To" it has to do with using the correct vocabulary.

コメント(3)

exclamation & question

Is the bottom part someone's answer to the above question?

As I see it, this is basic English, where the "for me" means
"私のために〜〜【してくれました】", and must just be memorized.

Substitute the "he bought a book" with any other past action phrase,
and the sentence still works:

 He built a space ship 矢印左右 for me. 
 He killed the vicious dragon 矢印左右 for me.
 He turned on the light 矢印左右 for me.
Note that both of these two sentences are also correct
(with different meanings):
 He bought a book for me. 矢印左右 本を持ってきてくれました。
 He brought a book for me. 本を買ってくれました。

手(チョキ)
hohoho! I see now. This is from another thread....
So, inquisitor, is the bottom part your addition,
along with the comment on ESL teachers?

Hmph!
The bottom part is indeed my addition along with my added commentary, yes.

ログインすると、みんなのコメントがもっと見れるよ

mixiユーザー
ログインしてコメントしよう!

☆NihonJack⇔日本ジャック☆ 更新情報

☆NihonJack⇔日本ジャック☆のメンバーはこんなコミュニティにも参加しています

星印の数は、共通して参加しているメンバーが多いほど増えます。