Ken Hayworth氏により、アルコー延命財団のクライオニクスは脳の微細構造が保たれていないと批判されています。
このコミュニティでも何度か議論の対象になりました、この批判文です。
http://
リンク先にあるような欠陥が指摘された以上は、アルコー延命財団のクライオニクスの処置に意味があるようには思えません。
脳の微細構造の破壊は、記憶の「完全消去」を意味するはず。
この考え方に賛同の方は「イイネ！」をお願いします！
このコミュニティでも何度か議論の対象になりました、この批判文です。
http://
リンク先にあるような欠陥が指摘された以上は、アルコー延命財団のクライオニクスの処置に意味があるようには思えません。
脳の微細構造の破壊は、記憶の「完全消去」を意味するはず。
この考え方に賛同の方は「イイネ！」をお願いします！
|
|
|
|
コメント(14)
アルコー延命財団のクライオニクスの欠陥を指摘しているのは、この部分です。
微細構造が保たれていないデータがある以上は、ここに書かれている批判は正しいはず。
>As a neuroscientist who was heavily quoted in the NYT article I feel compelled to rebut some of your points. First off, please do not conflate what a small, highly-suspect company like Alcor is offering with what is possible in principle if the scientific and medical community were to start research in earnest. I started the Brain Preservation Prize as a challenge to Alcor and other such companies to ‘put up or shut up’, challenging them to show that their methods preserve the synaptic circuitry of the brain. After five years they have been unable to meet our prize requirements even when their methods were tested (by a third party) under ideal laboratory conditions. Out of respect for loved ones I will not comment on any particular case, but it is clear from online case reports that their actual results are often far worse than the laboratory prepared tissue we imaged. Speaking personally, I wish that all such companies would stop offering services until, at a minimum, they demonstrate in an animal model that their methods and procedures are effective at preserving ultrastructure across the entire brain. By offering unproven brain preservation methods for a fee they are effectively making it impossible for mainstream scientists to engage in civil discussion on the topic.
微細構造が保たれていないデータがある以上は、ここに書かれている批判は正しいはず。
>As a neuroscientist who was heavily quoted in the NYT article I feel compelled to rebut some of your points. First off, please do not conflate what a small, highly-suspect company like Alcor is offering with what is possible in principle if the scientific and medical community were to start research in earnest. I started the Brain Preservation Prize as a challenge to Alcor and other such companies to ‘put up or shut up’, challenging them to show that their methods preserve the synaptic circuitry of the brain. After five years they have been unable to meet our prize requirements even when their methods were tested (by a third party) under ideal laboratory conditions. Out of respect for loved ones I will not comment on any particular case, but it is clear from online case reports that their actual results are often far worse than the laboratory prepared tissue we imaged. Speaking personally, I wish that all such companies would stop offering services until, at a minimum, they demonstrate in an animal model that their methods and procedures are effective at preserving ultrastructure across the entire brain. By offering unproven brain preservation methods for a fee they are effectively making it impossible for mainstream scientists to engage in civil discussion on the topic.
- mixiユーザー
- ログインしてコメントしよう！
|
|
|
|
クライオニクス 更新情報
-
最新のイベント
-
まだ何もありません
-
-
最新のアンケート
-
まだ何もありません
-
