With new textbooks for primary school students becoming thicker under the nation's new curriculum guidelines, a key task facing school administrators will be to ensure students have sufficient class hours to digest what they learn while also improving the quality of teachers.
The Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry announced Tuesday its departure from a decadelong emphasis on what is known as "education with latitude," or cram-free education, as it released the results of its screening of textbooks to be used at primary schools starting in academic year 2011.
The ministry said it endorsed all 148 textbooks in nine subjects submitted by private publishing companies after the fiscal 2009 screening.
The average number of pages in the textbooks screened under the new curriculum guidelines increased 43 percent from the textbooks screened in fiscal 2000, when curriculum contents suffered large cuts. Notably, the page count of science and arithmetic textbooks sharply increased, by 67 percent, from those screened in 2000.
The new science and arithmetic textbooks have sections in which students are encouraged to express ideas using their own words, and to understand the material via practical means rather than focusing on rote learning.
The arithmetic textbooks also include sections designed to encourage students to think logically, while the science texts include educational materials closely related to everyday lives.
Under the new guideline, publishers were requested to clearly state "the circumference ratio of pi is 3.14" in their textbooks although students are allowed to use the ratio as "3" in some cases.
Behind the curriculum changes lies the fact that the academic performance of Japanese students aged 15 has declined as shown by the results of the Program for International Student Assessment test conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Another survey on science and arithmetic education showed the number of Japanese primary school students who enjoyed studying science and arithmetic has been shrinking.
The new Japanese-language textbooks are introducing the use of newspaper content, urging students to read news stories while trying to understand how they were written and edited. This activity is designed to enhance students' language ability.
All social studies textbooks for fifth-grade students carry a reference to the territorial dispute with South Korea over the Takeshima islets.
Q1. Talk about your impressive memories in your school days.
学生時代の印象的な思い出を話してみてください。
Q2. What was your favorite subject in school? What kind of contents in it did you have interest in?
学校で好きな教科は何でしたか?その教科のどんな内容に興味がありましたか?
Q3. What do you think is the most important subject in elementary school? How about in junior high school? Why?
小学校でどの教科が一番大切だと思いますか?中学校ではどうでしょう?なぜですか?
Q4. Remember your memory about textbooks. What are your impressive or memorable contents of textbooks you've ever used?
Q5. The average number of pages in the textbooks screened under the new curriculum guidelines increased 43 percent from the textbooks screened in fiscal 2000. What do you think of this figure?
Q6. Teachers have to follow the screened textbooks and ‘curriculum guidelines' shown by the government especially in compulsory education. Education in Japan is more uniformalized and averaged because of this system. Do you think it's a good system?
Study Japan-ROK history for deeper understanding The Yomiuri Shimbun
For Japanese and South Koreans to have a common vision of the history of their two countries, it is important to find ways to deepen mutual understanding while acknowledging each other's different historical perspectives.
On Tuesday, the second Japan-South Korea joint history study panel of researchers unveiled its report.
In the first group's report, released in 2005, different views from historians from both countries over such issues as the legitimacy of the 1910 treaty on Japan's annexation of the Korean Peninsula and Japan's military actions on the peninsula in ancient times were compiled in the report.
Within the second joint study group, a subgroup focusing on history textbooks used in both countries was created in addition to the original three subpanels focusing on different historical periods established under the first joint panel.
===
Textbook group added
The textbook subgroup analyzed differences in the two countries' textbook systems and descriptions of historical events in their textbooks. In the report, the scholars involved wrote their research papers according to themes.
Here again, we can see fierce debate between the Japanese and South Korean scholars.
For instance, one South Korean researcher said that descriptions about so-called comfort women have been decreasing in Japanese textbooks in recent years and attributed this phenomenon to Japan's conservative swing in its political and social circumstances.
However, there was once a development in the comfort women issue that invited misunderstanding in the international community. In the early 1990s some Japanese newspapers published inaccurate information about the mobilization of the female volunteer work force in Japan during the Pacific War as the "hunt for comfort women" by the government." This information circulated in Japan and then in other countries.
In his comments to the South Korean researcher, a Japanese researcher criticized the thesis, saying it was based on an "argument with serious faults," referring to the paper's confusion of the female volunteer work force with comfort women.
Unless such factual errors are corrected, it will be hard to have constructive discussions.
===
S. Korean textbooks discussed
In discussions of textbooks in both countries, it has aways previously been problems with Japanese textbooks that have been taken up. This time, however, opinions were exchanged on problems in South Korean textbooks.
For instance, there was discussion of the use of the term "nittei," which can be taken to mean the "Japanese Empire," "Japanese imperialism," or "Japanese imperialists." The Japanese side questioned what the term really means or whether it means Japanese imperialists.
The Japanese side also said the use of the term "king" in South Korean textbooks as the title of the emperor is problematic.
From the South Korean side, too, there was a frank opinion expressed that descriptions of World War II in South Korean textbooks are inadequate.
August will mark the centennial of the conclusion of the treaty of Japan's annexation of the Korean Peninsula. There is a possibility that lively exchanges of opinion on issues including Japan's colonial rule of the peninsula will take place.
Naturally, it is not easy for Japan and South Korea to have common interpretations of their shared history.
It is undecided whether a new bilateral joint history study panel will be set up to continue this work, but we think the effort should be continued while respecting differences of perspective.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, March 24, 2010)
(Mar. 24, 2010)
Title: What should we do to have a good relationship with ROK? 質問については、後日お知らせします。